Opinions consist of views about the global garment trade from us, or occasionally - from other people. These are freely available to everyone.
While American voters were confounding practically all observers on November 8, on the other side of the Atlantic Britain’s Marks & Spencer unveiled a strategy that may be designed for a post-Brexit, post-Trump world.
Practically every observer thought Hillary Clinton would win the US Presidential election this morning. Most went on to predict her mild hostility to further trade liberalisation meant the short-term prospects for global trade would be looking uncertain by now.
Donald Trump, though, has been consistent and unambiguous about his trade policy.
Between June and September 2016, something hit UK clothing stores that I don’t think’s ever happened in the history of selling clothes, anywhere, ever before.
The internet’s share fell, consistently.
Britain’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) had earlier reported that the internet accounted for 13.3% of all clothing stores’ national sales in the previous quarter (April-June).
The partial destruction by rioters last week of the Saygin Dima mill in Ethiopia perfectly illustrates the short-term superficiality of too many ‘visionary’ sourcing strategies.
I spent the first six months of 2016 campaigning in Britain against Brexit. Not once did I hear a Brexit supporter attack global integration.
Bangladesh’s garment industry seems unaware of the real threat the June/July terrorism incidents pose to its long-term viability.
In the past two months, public-sector forecasters have made spectacularly different forecasts of job prospects in Asia’s apparel textile and apparel industries.
As the UK government prepares the ground for new post-Brexit free trade deals, the first published ideas deal with Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Most British comment about Brexit right now comes from grieving Remainers or Leavers who can’t believe their luck. Our industry must start planning to minimise the damage.
At 5 am today, UK voters for Brexit gained a majority. British apparel brands and retailers can benefit – but only if they sharpen up their acts.
In the first three months of this year, we saw a massive drop in Chinese apparel exports to the US. It doesn’t mean the end of China’s dominance.
China’s alleged “slump” is turning into opur industry’s greatest excuse for misguided thinking.
Is forced labour really apparel buyers top challenge?
Despite years of widely denied decline, British garment-making showed serious signs of a revival in the second half of 2015.